Seeing decisions before code is written

Philosophy

Editorial Principles

  • Not pretending neutrality — We establish our perspective upfront
  • Separating facts from interpretation — Clear distinction between Facts and Interpretation
  • Emphasizing upstream → downstream flow — Tracking the origin of decision-making
  • Making perspective explicit — Always showing from which standpoint we observe

3-Axis Thinking Framework

All analyses on this site assume the following three axes:

Product

Value hypothesis, users, desired experience

Engineering

Technology choices, design decisions, implementation feasibility

Organization / Architecture

Organizational structure, operations, governance, sustainability

All articles and analyses implicitly or explicitly address:
Where and what kind of trade-offs occur along these three axes

Understanding Open Source Communities

  • Organizational structures like SIG / WG / Projects are viewed as decision-making maturity levels, not technical classifications
  • Projects are analyzed as results of multiple constraints and compromises, not as finished products
  • Community governance models themselves are treated as factors influencing technical decisions

What This Site Aims For

Upstream Lens is not a site that presents the correct answers.
It is a lens for establishing thinking frameworks.

What readers should take away from this site:

  • An upstream perspective
  • A viewpoint to read other technical articles and discussions from different angles
  • A framework to articulate decision-making structures